THE PROPORTIONALITY OF LEGAL IMPACT MEASURES: DOCTRINAL GENESIS, COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION MODEL IN UZBEKISTAN

Abstract

This article explores the principle of proportionality as a universal methodological standard for constitutional control of legal impact measures. The study aims to develop a conceptual model for institutionalizing this principle in the Uzbek legal system based on a comparative analysis of eight jurisdictions and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The research employs comparative-legal, formal-legal, and systemic-structural analysis methods, as well as the reconstruction of judicial practice. The study identifies three functional levels of the proportionality principle and reveals a normative gap between the constitutional principle of proportionality and its implementation in Uzbekistan.